Iowa’s Adult Literacy Program
CASAS/GED Predictability Guidelines

 

DATE:  June 4, 2003

TO:  ABE Coordinators, State Level CASAS Level Trainers, Chief GED Examiners

FROM: Division of Community Colleges and Workforce Preparation

SUBJECT: Iowa’s Adult Literacy Program CASAS/GED Referral Guidelines

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide program guidelines to determine GED candidates’ readiness to successfully complete the GED 2002 Test Battery based on performance on the Comprehensive Adult Student Assessment System (CASAS) reading and mathematics Level C and D forms.  A three year multi state study designed to determine the relationship between CASAS and the GED 2002 Test Battery was examined utilizing data from California, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas and Oregon (N=3,669). The participating states submitted CASAS reading and mathematics scores along with GED 2002 test results which represented the first year of national utilization (February 2002-February 2003) of the GED 2002 Test battery.

The skills assessed by the GED 2002 Test Battery in the subtests of Language Arts, Reading and Mathematics were examined in relation to the competencies assessed by the CASAS Level C and D reading and mathematics forms. The results of the analysis indicated a high degree of correspondence between the two instruments in the areas reading and mathematics.  In other words, both instruments measured similar skills and abilities. (See Exhibit 1).  As adult learners moved up the CASAS scale from level C to D to E, the data indicated a significant increase in GED 2002 pass rates at each level. (See Tables 1-4). 

The following guidelines are designed to provide guidance to Iowa's adult literacy program ABE coordinators, GED level instructional staff and Iowa's GED chief and alternate examiners to determine GED candidates’ readiness to successfully complete the GED 2002 Test Battery or any one of the five (5) subtests. 

 

IOWA’S ADULT LITERACY PROGRAM REFERRAL GUIDELINES

TABLES AND GRAPHS

The tables and graphs are designed to serve as reference documents for GED instructors, ABE coordinators and GED chief and alternate examiners to determine GED candidates’ readiness to successfully complete the GED 2002 Test Battery.

SUMMARY

The results of the CASAS/GED 2002 Correlation Study provide the necessary documentation to formulate reasonable guidelines for GED candidates' probability of successfully completing the GED 2002 Test Battery based on performance results of the CASAS reading and mathematics Levels C and D assessments.  The guidelines are designed to be flexible but also to provide a frame work for reasonable decision making on the part of GED instructors, ABE coordinators and GED chief and alternate examiners.  Please disseminate these guidelines to all instructional personnel and GED alternate examiners.  The guidelines are effective as of June 15, 2003.

John Hartwig
Iowa Adult Education State Director


Table 1

A Percentage Rate of Passing Each GED Subtest Based
on the CASAS Assessments Based on CASAS Level D

 Standard Score Range

CASAS
Level

CASAS Standard
Score Range

GED
Subtest

Percent Passing
GED Subtest

Number of Observations

D

236-245

Language Arts, Reading

75%

1,676

D

236-245

Language Arts, Writing

70%

1,337

D

236-245

Mathematics

90%

1,015

D

236-245

Science

84%

1,705

D

236-245

Social Studies

84%

1,730

Notes:

  1. The GED subtests of Language Arts Reading, Language Arts Writing, Science, and Social Studies were matched to the CASAS reading assessment.
  2. The GED subtest of Mathematics was matched to the CASAS Mathematics assessment
  3. The percent passing rates were based on a GED standard score of 450 or above for all subtests.
  4. The CASAS standard score range corresponds at level D to the National  Reporting System (NRS) Educational Functioning Level (EFL) categories of “Adult Secondary Education (ASE) Low” and “English as a Second Language (ESL) High Advanced”.

Source:  Composite table based on the results of the CASAS/GED Correlation Study; 2003


Table 2

A Percentage Rate of Passing the GED Test Battery Based on the
 CASAS Reading and Mathematics Assessments Based on CASAS  Level D

Standard Score Range

CASAS
Level

CASAS Standard Score Range

CASAS
Assessment Area

Percent Passing GED Test Battery

Number of Observations

D

236-245

Reading

78%

1,163

D

236-245

Mathematics

93%

871

Notes:

  1. The GED pass rate is based on a GED standard score of 410 on each subtest and an average standard score of 450.

Source:  Composite table based on the results of the CASAS/GED Correlation Study; 2003


Table 3

A Percentage Rate of Passing Each GED Subtest Based on the CASAS Assessments Standard Score Based on CASAS Level E Standard Score Range

CASAS
Level

CASAS Standard
Score Range

GED
Subtest

Percent Passing GED Subtest

Number of Observations

E

246+

Language Arts, Reading

89%

1,751

E

246+

Language Arts, Writing

85%

1,552

E

246+

Mathematics

97%

302

D

246+

Science

97%

1,778

D

246+

Social Studies

96%

1,799

Notes:

  1. The GED subtests of Language Arts Reading, Language Arts Writing, Science, and Social Studies were matched to the CASAS reading assessment.
  2. The GED subtest of Mathematics was matched to the CASAS Mathematics assessment
  3. The percent  passing rates were based on a GED standard score of 450 or above for all subtests.
  4. The CASAS standard score range at Level E corresponds to the National Reporting System (NRS) Educational Functioning Level (EFL) category of “Adult Secondary Education (ASE) High”.

Source:  Composite table based on the results of the CASAS/GED Correlation Study; 2003


Table 4

A Percentage Rate of Passing the GED Test Battery Based on the
 CASAS Reading and Mathematics Assessments Based on CASAS Level E Standard Score Range

CASAS
Level

CASAS Standard Score Range

CASAS
Assessment Area

Percent Passing
GED Test Battery

Number of Observations

E

246+

Reading

94%

1,419

E

246+

Mathematics

99%

268

Notes:

5. The GED pass rate is based on a GED standard score of 410 on each subtest and an average standard score of 450.

Source:  Composite table based on the results of the CASAS/GED Correlation Study; 2003


EXHIBIT 1

CASAS Reading and Mathematics Skill Level Descriptions

CASAS
Level

Subject
Area

CASAS Skill Level Descriptor

D

Reading

Individuals functioning at this skill level generally can perform tasks that involve written instructions in both familiar and unfamiliar situations.  Other skills may include: reading and following multi-step directions; reading and interpreting manuals and legal forms; interpreting literary materials such as poetry and literature; creating and using tables and graphs; integrating information from multiple texts, charts and graphs; evaluating and organizing information.  They can also organize information and perform tasks that involve workplace communication skills.

D

Mathematics

Individuals functioning at this skill level generally can add, subtract, multiply, and divide whole numbers, fractions, and decimals.  Other skills may include using mathematics in the workplace, such as calculating discounts; comparing prices to determine the best buys for goods and services; creating and using tables and graphs; computing standard measurement for length, width, perimeter, and area.  They generally can organize, implement and perform multi-level calculations.

E

Reading

Individuals functioning at this skill level are able to read most written material encountered in the workplace, including forms, work procedures, and personal manuals.  They can interpret technical information, training materials, and some technical manuals.  They can interpret computer-generated materials in the form of databases and spreadsheets.  They can read articles on unfamiliar topics written in more complex language.

E

Mathematics

Individuals functioning at this skill level are able to apply multi-step operations involving percents; apply proportion and ration; using decimal time; apply formulas to determine volume; devise formulas.  They can apply these skills to: compare quantities such as changes in sales and production totals; compare relative quantities of material resources used; interpret and record time in decimal format (e.g. 1.4 hours); calculate volume of material required or used in manufacturing or construction; devise algebraic formulas to facilitate calculations.

Source:   CASAS/GED Correlation Study; 2003